Brande Royale Part 2

By Brand Heeler

A tale of heraldry

We were talking the other day (see Brande Royale Part 1) about royalty and trade marks and that got us thinking about heraldry. In many ways, coats of arms were the forerunner of modern trade marks – how else to distinguish knights in otherwise identical suits of armour? An eye-catching design on a shield let you tell friend from foe and so avoid all sorts of potentially embarrassing and ugly scenes, on the battlefield and elsewhere. And, much like modern logos, the simplest arms are the best. The red and white cross of the City of London, the lion rampant of Scotland, the black and white ermine of Brittany – simple, bold, eye-catching.

Inevitably, once all the basic deisgns were spoken for, armigers had to get a bit more creative. And as coats of arms got more popular, they also got busier and more contrived. VIPs started adding more and more imagery to try to stand out from each other, while also conveying as much of their (self)importance as possible. An increasingly elaborate code evolved in which each and every element of a blazon told a story to anyone who could decipher it. But this often led to rather fussy shields. Even as early as the Wars of the Roses, Warwick the Kingmaker was using this congested design to show off his illustrious heritage. There’s quite a lot going on there!

We were in London the other day, giving a seminar on trade mark law, and we noticed these rather attractive stained-glass windows:

Attractive, but arcane. We can recognise the bottom left one as the Corporation of London because it’s still widely used. But the rest? Now lost in the mists of time (unless anyone can enlighten us?) There’s a lesson for all brand-owners here. You need to ensure your brand stays identifiable, meaningful and relevant. And, while you’re at it, simple and elegant are also good, otherwise you risk going the way of heraldry and fading into obscurity and obfuscation.

Perhaps the nadir of heraldry’s decline is this monstrosity, which purports to set out the many and varied interrelations of the Temple-Nugent-Brydges-Chandos-Grenville family. Crazy name, crazy shield! Don’t let this happen to your brand…

Temple-Nugent-Brydges-Chandos-Grenville family

This article contains our thoughts and opinions on an issue of general interest and is written from the perspective of Australian and/or English law. It is not legal advice and is not provided in the context of a solicitor-client relationship. It may not even be relevant to your jurisdiction. No duty of care is assumed or accepted. Please carry out appropriate research and consult with a suitably qualified legal expert before taking any action or making any decisions.